, , , ,

Recent carbon-dating doesn’t answer the question of attribution of the new Mona Lisa.  Text from The Art Newspaper with Japanese translation.

炭素年代測定では、話題のモナリザの作者を断定できなかったようです。The Art Newspaperの記事と、試訳です。


Was Isleworth Mona Lisa painted before the Louvre’s version?


Swiss institute’s carbon-dating fails to answer question of attribution


By Martin Bailey. Web only
Published online: 26 March 2013
文)Martin Bailey ウェブ版限定

The debate over the authenticity of the “Isleworth Mona Lisa” looks set to continue, following carbon-dating of the canvas. The copy of Leonardo’s masterpiece was greeted with some scepticism when it was unveiled in Geneva last autumn (The Art Newspaper, November 2012, p3), with most experts failing to support the claim that the work is by Leonardo.

「アイルワースのモナリザ」の真偽を問う議論が、キャンバスの炭素年代測定の結果を受け、再燃しているようだ。昨秋、ジュネーヴでダヴィンチの作品であると発表された時(The Art Newspaper2012年11月号3ページ)、疑念が持ち上がり、専門家の多くがその説を支持できなかった。

The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich has now dated a small sample taken from the canvas to between 1410 and 55, with a 95% probability it lies within this range.


The Mona Lisa Foundation, which is promoting research on the Isleworth copy, believes that Leonardo painted the picture shortly before he began the Louvre version in 1503. The Isleworth Mona Lisa got its name a century ago when it was bought by Hugh Blaker, a critic and restorer, who lived in the west London suburb. The foundation, which is convinced the portrait is by the master, argues that the early date for the canvas is strong evidence against the painting being a later copy.

Image: The Mona Lisa Foundation


However, it seems curious that Leonardo would have used canvas that was 45 to 90 years old, since the material was relatively cheap. The paints would have been much more expensive and the artist would have taken considerable time on a first version of the composition, making it surprising that he skimped on the support.


David Feldman, the vice president of the foundation, points out that Leonardo had used canvas while in Florence in the 1470s, and that he could have saved a piece that he later used for the earlier version of the Mona Lisa, which is on a “similar Rheims canvas”. He says Leonardo had to be frugal on his return to Florence in 1500 and “could not afford to pay rent”.


The foundation is planning to exhibit the Isleworth Mona Lisa in Singapore next year. The painting is then scheduled to go on to Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing, before going to America and Europe.